Possibility of new diocese for Medjugorje floated :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)

There has been some talk about the extracting Medjugorje from the current diocese. I truly do not have any strong position on that. Somehow I think nothing is wrong with this diocese so why change. It cannot be the bishop's opposing to the "phenomena" , I mean he would accept the ruling of the CDF and act accordingly. After all he is a very obedient and very good bishop /father/ to all of us. He has been always very open and very ready to help to me , even though he knew I am very much involved with phenomena (being a guide for the pilgrims, as well as being born in Grude). I never had any problems and I was always very welcomed to the cathedral with my Medjugorje pilgrims.

Now, it could be some "church" thing that is beyond my knowledge or understanding (after all I am just another catholic mom)

But truth is also that , in the past two years, Holy Father has made divisions, thus creating several new diocese in Croatia ( Bjelovarsko- Križevačka recently)

Also when reading this article it suggested that new diocese with a possible see in Makarska would be created from territory currently falling within the dioceses of Dubrovnik, Mostar and Spalato.

Now it bothers me... how it can be formed from the parts of two different independent countries? Can it be formed that way? Under which BC does it fall then , Croatian or Bosnia and Herzegovina ?

Fact is that we are the same people but we are two different countries!

Can this be and how? Anyone????

Here is the text from CNA

Rome, Italy, Mar 22, 2010 / 04:52 pm (CNA).- Following last week's announcement that a commission is being formed to investigate possible Marian apparitions at Medjugorje, a typically well-informed Vatican journalist has reported that a new diocese could be formed in the area to include the Bosnian city. Taking territory currently under the jurisdiction of three other dioceses, including Mostar, where Medjugorje is located, the diocese would “permit a better administration of the flow of pilgrims.”

The veteran Vatican writer Andrea Tornielli reported in the Saturday edition of Il Giornale, an Italian newspaper, of the renewed possibility of the erection of a diocese that would make Medjugorje independent from the Diocese of Mostar, which is run by Bishop Ratko Peric. He has been vocal in his skepticism of the authenticity of the apparitions.

Tornielli wrote that the decision to create the new diocese, with a possible see in Makrska, was nearly made last September, but was put off in part by the opposition of Bishop Peric.

The new diocese would be created from territory currently falling within the dioceses of Dubrovnik, Mostar and Spalato.

Regarding the commission created by the Vatican to investigate the Medjugorje “phenomena” under presidency of Cardinal Camillo Ruini, Tornielli has reported that other members include Cardinal Archbishop of Sarajevo Vinko Pulijc, Archbishop Josip Bozanic of Zagreb and Cardinal Julián Herranz, president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts.

Tornielli also mentioned that others expected to sit on the commission are Archbishop Angelo Amato, the prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints; Jesuit Father Tony Anatrella, a psychologist, and other experts in “Mariology.” According to his estimation, lay people will also be included in the approximately 20 person commission.

The reporter from Il Giornale wrote that it should be expected that the process of the commission will be slow and its results will not be a statement on the “supernatural nature” of the events, but rather a clearer picture of the “suspended” judgment by Yugoslav bishops after investigations on the matter 20 years ago.

The commission will make sure that there are no “scams, tricks, or diabolical facts” involved and could in addition provide “clear, precise and authoritative directions for pilgrims.”

Tornielli noted that the Holy See has never pronounced a judgement on a case of apparitions that are still in progress.